AI · 26 October 2026
LibreOffice Foundation Rules Out AI in Standard Install for Now
The Document Foundation says the standard LibreOffice installation will exclude AI features for now, citing unmet requirements for privacy, user control and open standards. The decision was set out in a Foundation blog post, as reported by Computerworld.
What happened
The Document Foundation, the organisation behind the free LibreOffice office suite, has said the standard installation will not include any artificial intelligence features for now. Computerworld reports that the decision was set out in a Foundation blog post.
According to the post, the choice is not based on opposition to AI in principle. The Foundation says current AI technology does not yet meet its requirements for privacy, user control and open standards. Any future AI feature would need to let users decide where the model runs, avoid collecting telemetry, and avoid locking users into a single vendor. AI-generated content would need to use the Open Document Format (ODF), and AI functions would need to be entirely optional.
The post also indicates that an AI solution meeting these conditions could be considered later. The material available for this briefing does not set out the details of that route, so it should be read as a stated openness to revisiting the question rather than a confirmed roadmap.
Why it matters
This is a product governance decision, not simply a missing feature. As AI moves into the tools people use to write, calculate and share documents, the question is no longer only whether a product includes AI. It is who controls the model, where data is processed, and whether the output stays portable. The Foundation's criteria correspond to issues that enterprise buyers and public-sector teams already raise, including data residency, telemetry, vendor dependence and file-format lock-in.
For leaders running digital transformation programmes, the signal is that "AI-enabled" is becoming a procurement and experience question. When users feel their work is being routed elsewhere, or cannot easily move it, they lose trust and control, even if the AI feature itself performs well.
The Renascence take
The headline presents "no AI" as a feature. We think the instinct is sound, but the reason matters more than the stance.
Most readers will hear a rejection of AI. The more useful reading is that the Foundation has defined the experience conditions AI must meet before it earns a place in the product. Control over where processing happens, no hidden data collection, no lock-in and a genuine opt-out are consent and agency principles, and they belong at the start of any AI design brief rather than at the end of a privacy review. Operators should treat AI optionality and data-location choices as visible, user-facing features and test them with the same rigour as the AI output itself.
Sources
This briefing was written by our Newsdesk, synthesising reporting from the outlets below. Follow the links for the original coverage.
FAQ
Questions we get on this topic
More in AI
Stay ahead of CX
Get the signal, not the noise.
The stories shaping customer experience — plus the Journal and Experience Loom — in your inbox.


