About

The consultancy born at the intersection of behavioral economics and human experience.

René Studio
AI EXPERIENCE STUDIO

The CX design platform we built from a decade of client work.

Explore René Studio
Mysterya
MYSTERY AUDITS, LIVE

Mystery audits we run, scored live for every location.

Explore Mysterya
NOW HIRING

Join a team reshaping how the world experiences brands.

View open roles →

COMPANY

GROW WITH US

CONNECT

Services

Comprehensive CX and management consulting for enterprise brands.

René Studio
AI EXPERIENCE STUDIO

Every engagement, mapped and scored in one AI workspace.

Explore René Studio
Mysterya
MYSTERY AUDITS, LIVE

Mystery shopping, scored and evidenced in real time.

Explore Mysterya
ALL SERVICES

Explore the full range of CX & management consulting services.

Browse all services →

CORE

SPECIALIST

Solutions

Structured solutions that turn CX ambition into measurable outcomes.

René Studio
AI EXPERIENCE STUDIO

Map, score and fix the journeys we redesign, with AI.

Explore René Studio
Mysterya
MYSTERY AUDITS, LIVE

Check the experience you designed is delivered.

Explore Mysterya
ALL SOLUTIONS

Explore every CX solution we offer.

Browse solutions →

STRATEGY & GOVERNANCE

DESIGN & DELIVERY

CULTURE & EXPERIENCE

Industries

A decade of CX transformation across the region's defining sectors.

René Studio
AI EXPERIENCE STUDIO

Sector-ready journeys, scored by AI in minutes.

Explore René Studio
Mysterya
MYSTERY AUDITS, LIVE

Mystery audits tuned to your sector, scored live.

Explore Mysterya
ALL INDUSTRIES

See how we work across every sector.

Browse industries →

BUILT ENVIRONMENT

FINANCE & TECH

PEOPLE & MOBILITY

Products

Proprietary tools, platforms, and AI that power CX transformation.

René Studio
AI EXPERIENCE STUDIO

Design, score and fix customer journeys with AI.

Explore René Studio
Mysterya
MYSTERY AUDITS, LIVE

Audit every location and act on what you find.

Explore Mysterya
REBELDECK A · 36 FORCES

The forces that shape how humans experience the world.

Explore REBEL Reveal →
ALL PRODUCTS

Explore the full Renascence product ecosystem.

Browse products →

PLATFORMS

AI & TECHNOLOGY

LEARNING & FRAMEWORKS

CX TOOLKIT

Opinion

Insights, research, and conversations at the frontier of CX.

René Studio
AI EXPERIENCE STUDIO

Turn what you read into a journey you can score.

Explore René Studio
Mysterya
MYSTERY AUDITS, LIVE

See what customers really experience, visit by visit.

Explore Mysterya
ReadExperience JournalArticles & research on CX, behavior, and transformation.Watch & listenExperience LoomOur video podcast on CX & behavior.CuratedCX NewsIndustry news that matters in CX, minus the noise.

Latest articles

Latest episodes

Latest news

Hub

Free tools, templates, and resources to advance your CX practice.

René Studio
AI EXPERIENCE STUDIO

Design, score and fix customer journeys with AI.

Explore René Studio
Mysterya
MYSTERY AUDITS, LIVE

Every visit, every location, every score. Live.

Explore Mysterya
THE MANIFESTOBurn the Deck.
Ten Virtues. Zero Excuses.Start reading →
THE HUB

Every free tool, template and resource in one place.

Visit the Hub →

AI TOOLS

FREE TOOLS

LEARNING

CULTURE

AI · 8 November 2026

Chatbot Refuseniks Now Outnumber US Users, Pew Finds

Pew Research Center's survey finds 51% of Americans say no to chatbot use, with lack of interest, not lack of skill, cited as the main barrier. The Register reported the findings on 12 October 2026.

Newsdesk
Curated briefing · 2 min read

What happened

Half of Americans say they do not want to use chatbots, and most of them cite a lack of interest rather than a lack of know-how. Pew Research Center's survey finds that 51% of Americans say no to chatbot use. The Register, reporting on 12 October 2026, frames these non-users as "refuseniks" who now slightly outnumber active users in the US.

The reporting highlights the reason behind the refusal. Respondents point to a lack of interest as the top barrier, not a lack of technical skill or confidence in using the tools. That distinction separates a problem of ability, which training can solve, from a problem of motivation, which depends on whether people see a clear reason to change how they work or seek help.

Why it matters

For organisations rolling out AI assistants, chatbots and self-service automation, the finding challenges a common assumption: that slow adoption reflects a skills gap. If many people decline because they are not interested, then more tutorials and access alone will not close the gap. Leaders will need to show what the tool does better than the existing route, whether that is a phone call, a form or a human agent.

The result also matters for service design. Where a channel is positioned as the default, people who opt out may face extra effort or lose access to the same outcome. Designing for choice, with clear and equal paths for those who prefer not to use a chatbot, is likely to matter as much as improving the bot itself.

By the numbers

  • 51% of Americans say no to using chatbots, according to Pew Research Center.
  • 12 October 2026 is the date of The Register's report on the findings.

The Renascence take

Most coverage will treat this as a question of digital literacy. The more useful reading is that refusal is a verdict on value, and value is what service teams most often fail to demonstrate.

Lack of interest is a signal about relevance and friction, not a call for more awareness campaigns. Behavioural economics shows that people rarely adopt a new channel unless its benefit is obvious at the moment of need. Operators should audit which journeys a chatbot genuinely shortens, keep a fully equal non-chatbot route, and measure opt-out reasons rather than only completion rates.

Sources

This briefing was written by our Newsdesk, synthesising reporting from the outlets below. Follow the links for the original coverage.

FAQ

Questions we get on this topic

According to Pew Research Center, 51% of Americans say no to using chatbots. The Register reported on the findings on 12 October 2026.

Respondents most often cite a lack of interest rather than a lack of technical know-how or confidence in using the tools, according to the reporting.

It suggests slow adoption may reflect motivation rather than a skills gap, so tutorials and access alone may not close adoption gaps. Leaders may need to show the tool offers a clearer benefit than phone, form or human-agent routes.

Designing clear, equal non-chatbot paths for customers who prefer not to use a bot is likely to matter as much as improving the bot itself, and measuring opt-out reasons alongside completion rates can help.

Stay ahead of CX

Get the signal, not the noise.

The stories shaping customer experience — plus the Journal and Experience Loom — in your inbox.