Hospitality · 18 October 2026
Saudia Tops Saudi Airline Complaint Ranking for August, Riyadh Air Second
Saudi Arabia's August ranking of airlines by passenger complaints places Saudia first on lowest complaint rate and Riyadh Air second, with flynas and flyadeal also listed, per Arabian Business.
What happened
Saudi Arabia has published its August ranking of airlines by passenger complaints, with Saudia recording the lowest complaint rate and Riyadh Air placing second. According to Arabian Business, flynas and flyadeal also appear in the ranking.
The table gives travellers and industry observers a single, comparable view of how carriers perform on service-related grievances over one month. Saudia's position at the top is the headline finding, with Riyadh Air following in second place.
The material available for this briefing covers the headline and summary only. It does not include complaint volumes, complaint categories or the full methodology, so readers who need those details should consult the original report.
Why it matters
Publishing complaint rankings turns service quality into something travellers can compare before they book. It also gives airlines a public benchmark on a measure that is usually kept within their own customer-service operations, where it may not be widely visible.
For leaders in experience and operations, a complaint is a record of a moment when expectation and delivery diverged. Those moments occur at booking, check-in, baggage handling, disruption and resolution after the flight. Carriers that analyse complaints by journey stage can see where failures cluster, which gives them more to act on than an aggregate satisfaction score alone.
The Renascence take
Most coverage will read this as a league table. We read it as a behavioural signal about where service design is breaking down.
A complaint rate is a lagging indicator of how often expectations fail, so the real competitive question is not who sits first but which moments generate complaints in the first place. Passengers tend to judge an airline less on the flight itself than on how it recovers when something goes wrong, and that recovery is where service design either rebuilds trust or loses it. Operators who want to climb the table should map complaint themes against the end-to-end journey, fix the friction that repeats, and treat a low rate as a checkpoint rather than a finish line.
Sources
This briefing was written by our Newsdesk, synthesising reporting from the outlets below. Follow the links for the original coverage.
FAQ
Questions we get on this topic
More in Hospitality
Stay ahead of CX
Get the signal, not the noise.
The stories shaping customer experience — plus the Journal and Experience Loom — in your inbox.


