AI · 2 September 2026
After successful DMV pilot, Nebraska expands Tyler Technologies AI tools statewide
The AI assistant generated more than 3,400 referrals to state online services and helped reduce call volume by 20% in some areas, according to Mitch Greenwall, deputy director of the Nebraska DMV.
What happened
Nebraska is rolling out Tyler Technologies' AI assistant across state government after a pilot at the Department of Motor Vehicles showed measurable gains in deflecting calls to self-service channels. According to Mitch Greenwall, deputy director of the Nebraska DMV, the tool generated more than 3,400 referrals to online services during the trial and cut call volume by 20% in some areas, prompting the state to extend the technology beyond the DMV to other agencies.
The assistant is designed to guide residents toward existing online transactions and information rather than replace call-centre staff outright, functioning as a conversational layer that sits in front of the state's digital services.
Why it matters
This is a clear example of AI adoption in the public sector moving from pilot to statewide deployment on the strength of operational evidence rather than promise. For GovTech leaders, the Nebraska case offers a template: prove a narrow, measurable use case — call deflection at a single agency — before scaling the same tool horizontally across government functions.
It also signals a shift in how citizen-facing AI is being framed: not as a replacement for human service but as a triage layer that routes people to the right digital channel faster, reducing friction on both ends of the interaction — for residents seeking simple transactions and for staff fielding calls that could have been self-served.
By the numbers
- 3,400+ referrals generated by the AI assistant directing users to Nebraska's online services during the DMV pilot
- 20% reduction in call volume in some areas following deployment of the tool
The Renascence take
The headline number here isn't the referral count — it's that a government agency found a way to make "call deflection" actually work, which most organisations, public or private, still struggle to do without frustrating the very people they're trying to serve.
Most call-deflection tools fail because they try to talk customers out of calling; Nebraska's approach appears to have succeeded because it pointed people toward a task they could complete themselves, rather than blocking access to a human. That distinction — assistance versus obstruction — is the entire behavioral-economics lesson buried in this story. Any operator, public or private, chasing similar efficiency gains should ask whether their AI layer is genuinely reducing effort for the customer, or simply relocating the friction one step earlier in the journey.
Sources
This briefing was written by our Newsdesk, synthesising reporting from the outlets below. Follow the links for the original coverage.
More in AI
Stay ahead of CX
Get the signal, not the noise.
The stories shaping customer experience — plus the Journal and Experience Loom — in your inbox.