General · 13 August 2026
Don Don Donki apologises over cockroach found in Singapore sushi
Japanese retail chain Don Don Donki has publicly apologised after a customer found a cockroach in sushi bought at one of its Singapore outlets, following an online complaint.
What happened
Japanese retail chain Don Don Donki has issued a public apology after a customer reported finding a cockroach in a sushi product purchased at one of its Singapore outlets. The chain's response follows the customer's complaint, which drew attention online and prompted the company to address the incident directly.
Details of the specific outlet, the product involved and the chain's remedial steps beyond the apology have not been fully disclosed in reporting so far.
Why it matters
Food safety lapses are among the fastest-moving reputational risks in retail and hospitality, because they trigger visceral disgust responses that spread rapidly through social sharing. A single image or account, credible or not, can shape perception of an entire chain's hygiene standards far more powerfully than routine positive experiences ever could.
For customer experience and service-design practitioners, incidents like this are a reminder that recovery speed and tone matter as much as the underlying operational fix. How a brand acknowledges a failure — promptly, specifically, and with visible follow-through — heavily influences whether the story becomes a one-day blip or a lasting trust problem.
The Renascence take
Most coverage of incidents like this focuses on the "gross-out" factor, but the more useful lens is behavioral: disgust-triggering failures activate loss-aversion far more strongly than equivalent monetary or convenience failures, so standard apology templates often under-deliver relative to the emotional intensity of the complaint.
What gets missed here is that an apology alone rarely resolves a disgust-based trust breach — customers need visible proof of systemic correction, not just contrition. A customer-obsessed operator would pair the apology with a transparent, specific account of what changed in sourcing, storage or quality checks, because vague reassurance reads as damage control rather than genuine accountability. The brands that recover fastest from these moments are the ones that treat the affected customer's experience as the design brief for a real fix, not just a PR obligation to close out.
Sources
This briefing was written by our Newsdesk, synthesising reporting from the outlets below. Follow the links for the original coverage.
FAQ
Questions we get on this topic
More in General
Stay ahead of CX
Get the signal, not the noise.
The stories shaping customer experience — plus the Journal and Experience Loom — in your inbox.